Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fellows v. W. C. Ellis Building Company

Supreme Court of Arizona

November 6, 1939

WILLIAM J. FELLOWS, Appellant,
v.
W. C. ELLIS BUILDING COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellee

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. M. T. Phelps, Judge. Judgment affirmed.

Mr. William J. Fellows, Appellant, in propria persona.

Messrs. Gust, Rosenfeld, Divelbess, Robinette & Coolidge, for Appellee.

OPINION

ROSS, C.J.

This action was brought by the W. C. Ellis Building Company to recover the possession from defendant of office suite 229 of the Ellis Building, situate on Lots 7, 9 and 11 of Block 90 of the Original Townsite of Phoenix, for failure on the part of the defendant to pay the rent agreed upon. The defendant filed a general demurrer and a plea of not guilty. The demurrer was overruled and the case tried without a jury. Judgment for possession of said office suite was rendered for plaintiff, and defendant has appealed. His assignments are:

[54 Ariz. 326] "I. That the judgment is contrary to the law and evidence.

"II. That there is an order between the allegations of plaintiff's complaint and his proof.

"III. That the notice required by statute, and served by the plaintiff described the premises different from that alleged in plaintiff's complaint and different from that set up in the judgment."

Assignment No. 1 is too general and indefinite. We have so many times refused to accept such an assignment as sufficient and proper. The other two may not be determined without the evidence and the evidence is not here.

The judgment is affirmed.

LOCKWOOD and McALISTER JJ., concur. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.