Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lollie v. Gc Services Lp

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

June 11, 2013

Manrico Lollie, Plaintiff,
v.
GC Services LP, Defendant.

ORDER

FREDERICK J. MARTONE, Senior District Judge.

Before the court is defendant's motion to compel documents (doc. 24) and plaintiff's response (doc. 29).

This action involves a dispute under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692. Defendant, a collection agency, is attempting to collect a debt on behalf of United Student Aid Funds ("USA Funds"). Plaintiff alleges that he does not owe the debt. As evidence of his payment, he attaches to the Complaint a letter from USA Funds, which provides that "USA Funds considers your obligation to repay the loan(s) mentioned above satisfied." Compl., Ex. B. Although Exhibit B is only a single page, defendant contends that it is clear from references in the letter that the USA Funds letter is at least two pages long. Because of the letter's obvious importance in determining whether a debt is owed, defendant now moves to compel disclosure of a complete copy of Exhibit B.

Plaintiff has refused to disclose any additional pages that he has in his possession, or alternatively to provide in writing that he is not in possession, custody or control of a complete copy of Exhibit B. Instead, plaintiff's counsel has argued that defendant is not entitled to compel Exhibit B because defendant has not served any discovery requesting a complete copy of Exhibit B. Plaintiff appears to indirectly assert that he is not in possession of a second page to Exhibit B. See Response at 2. He has asserted that he would disclose "any additional information regarding Exhibit B." Motion, Ex. 1 at 5. But after repeated requests, he has failed to either produce a complete copy of the letter or confirm that he is not in possession of additional pages.

Plaintiff has an obligation under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A) and (e) to disclose to defendant a complete copy of Exhibit B or to affirmatively state that he does not have a complete copy. Plaintiff and his counsel have failed to comply.

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED GRANTING defendant's motion to compel (doc. 24). On or before June 14, 2013, plaintiff shall either produce a complete copy of Exhibit B or state affirmatively that he does not have a complete copy in his possession or control.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff and his counsel shall pay defendant's reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, caused by their failure to comply with Rule 26(a)(1)(A) and (e). See Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2)(C).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.