STEPHEN M. McNAMEE, Senior District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), Plaintiff moves the Court to dismiss this case against the remaining Defendants, Stanley Howard Wasserkrug and Susan Schwartz Wasserkrug, husband and wife, and as trustees of The Wasserkrug Family Trust ("the Wasserkrugs"). (Doc. 107.) Pursuant to Rule 54(b), on February 28, 2012, a Judgment was entered against all other Defendants. (Doc. 96.) The parties originally intended for the Judgment to be entered against the Wasserkrugs as well, but the Wasserkrugs filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on December 21, 2011, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada, Case No. 11-29314-lbr. A Notice of Bankruptcy was filed on December 29, 2011. (Doc. 88.) Due to the automatic stay provisions of 11 U.S.C. 362, Plaintiff indicates that its only option is to dismiss the case without prejudice. (Doc. 107.)
Rule 41(a)(2) allows for dismissal by court order upon a plaintiff's request "on terms that the court considers proper." Rule 41(a)(2). A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) is addressed to the district court's sound discretion. Stevedoring Servs. of Am. v. Armilla Int'l B.V. , 889 F.2d 919, 921 (9th Cir. 1989). Pursuant to Plaintiff's terms and request, the Court will grant its motion to dismiss this case without prejudice.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Plaintiff's motion to dismiss this case without prejudice pursuant to ...