Court of Appeals of Arizona, First Division, Department E
Not for Publication Rule 111, Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County Cause No. CR2012-122238-001 SE The Honorable Brian D. Kaiser, Commissioner
Thomas C. Horne, Arizona Attorney General Phoenix By Joseph T. Maziarz, Chief Counsel Criminal Appeals Attorneys for Appellee.
James J. Haas, Maricopa County Public Defender Phoenix By Terry J. Adams, Deputy Public Defender Attorneys for Appellant.
PATRICIA K. NORRIS, Presiding Judge.
¶1 Megan McDonough timely appeals from her conviction and the imposition of supervised probation for aggravated assault. Ariz. Rev. Stat. ("A.R.S.") § 13-1204(8)(e) (Supp. 2012). After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law that was not frivolous, McDonough's counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Leon, 104 Ariz. 297, 451 P.2d 878 (1969), asking this court to search the record for fundamental error. This court granted counsel's motion to allow McDonough to file a supplemental brief in propria persona, but McDonough did not do so. After reviewing the entire record, we find no fundamental error and, therefore, affirm McDonough's conviction and probation.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 On April 27, 2012, McDonough went to a hospital in Maricopa County, Arizona, and in the course of checking in, stated she was suicidal. Following the hospital procedures, the nurse moved McDonough to a private room, took her belongings, and asked her to change into a hospital gown. McDonough became upset and "[s]tormed out" of the hospital. Although McDonough eventually returned to the hospital, she caused "a commotion in the hallway, " refused to change into the gown, and screamed at hospital staff. When McDonough "started pushing her way out of the [examination] room, " for her safety and the safety of others, nurses and a security guard attempted to restrain her to a bed. During the struggle, McDonough kicked a nurse in the chest and stomach.
¶3 Subsequently, a grand jury indicted McDonough for aggravated assault. Before trial, the State moved to designate the aggravated assault count as a class one misdemeanor and conduct a bench trial, and, without objection by McDonough, the superior court granted the State's motion. After finding McDonough guilty of aggravated assault, the superior court suspended imposition of sentence and placed her on supervised probation for one year.
¶4 We have reviewed the entire record for reversible error and find none. See Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300, 451 P.2d at 881. All of the proceedings were conducted in compliance with the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure. So far as the record reveals, McDonough was represented by counsel at all stages of the proceedings and was present at all critical stages. There was sufficient evidence for the superior court to find McDonough committed the offense, and the probation imposed was within the statutory limits. See A.R.S. § 13-1204(D) (Supp. 2012) (aggravated assault against licensed health care practitioner is class six felony); A.R.S. § 13-604 (2010) (class six felony may be designated as class one misdemeanor); A.R.S. § 13-707 (2010) (class one misdemeanor is punishable by six months of imprisonment); A.R.S. § 13-902(A)(5) (Supp. 2012) (for class one misdemeanor, probation may continue for three years).
¶5 Although the trial minute entry and the sentencing minute entry both stated McDonough waived the right to a trial by jury, McDonough did not waive her right to a jury trial. McDonough was not entitled to a jury trial because she was tried for a class one misdemeanor, which was punishable by no more than six months of incarceration. A.R.S. § 13-707 (2010); Derendal v. Griffith, 209 Ariz. 416, 418-19, ¶ 6, 422, ¶ 21, 104 P.3d 147, 149-50, 153 (2005) (criminal offense for which maximum statutory penalty is less than six months of incarceration is presumptively an offense for which right to jury trial does not attach). Nevertheless, we correct the trial minute entry and sentencing minute entry, respectively, to delete the following: "the Defendant has previously waived her right to trial by jury[, ]" and "WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL: The Defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to a trial by jury[.]"
¶6 We decline to order briefing and affirm McDonough's conviction and ...