Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Mosqueda

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

September 24, 2013

J & J Sports Productions, Inc., Plaintiffs,
Adrian Mosqueda, individually and d/b/a Adrian's Restaurant, Defendants.


DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge.

Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions Incorporated has filed a motion for award of costs and attorneys' fees. Doc. 35. The motion is fully briefed. For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny Plaintiff's motion.

I. Background.

A boxing match titled "The Event": The Manny Pacquiao v. Joshua Clottey WBO Welterweight Championship ("the Program") was telecast nationwide on March 13, 2010. Doc. 25-1 ¶ 1; Doc. 26 at 2. Plaintiff owned the exclusive commercial distribution rights to the Program, including undercard events and all color commentary. Doc. 25-1 ¶ 2. Plaintiff's investigator, Frank Balkom, Sr., observed the Program being displayed at Adrian's Restaurant on March 13, 2010. Id. ¶ 7. Defendant did not pay a commercial licensing fee to Plaintiff to broadcast the Program (Doc. 25-1 ¶ 4; Doc. 26 at 2), and did not have permission from Plaintiff to broadcast the Program at Defendant's commercial establishment (Doc. 25-1 ¶ 5; Doc. 26 at 2). The Court granted Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 25) with respect to all claims except the claim under § 553, which it denied as moot (Doc. 33 at 7), and ordered Defendant to pay damages. Doc. 33 at 8.

II. Legal Standard.

Pursuant to Local Rule 54.2(b), a party seeking to recover attorneys' fees must file and serve a motion "within fourteen (14) days of entry of judgment in the action with respect to which the services were rendered." LRCiv 54.2(b)(1). At a minimum, the motion must specify the applicable judgment and the statutory or contractual authority entitling the party to the award, and the amount of attorneys' fees and related non-taxable expenses sought or a fair estimate of such amount. LRCiv 54.2(b)(1)(A)-(B).

The party seeking attorneys' fees must also file and serve a memorandum in support of the motion and all supporting documentation. LRCiv 54.2(b)(2). The supporting memorandum must include a discussion of eligibility, entitlement, and the reasonableness of the requested award. LRCiv 54.2(c)(1)-(3). Local rule 54.2(c) sets forth the issues, factors, and legal authority that must be addressed in the memorandum's separate eligibility and entitlement sections. LRCiv 54.2(c)(1)-(2). A party seeking to recover fees must also attach supporting documentation to the memorandum, including (1) a statement of consultation; (2) "a complete copy of any written fee agreement, or a full recitation of any oral fee agreement"; (3) a task-based itemized statement of fees and expenses; (4) an affidavit of moving counsel; and (5) "[a]ny other affidavits or evidentiary matter deemed appropriate under the circumstances or required by law." LRCiv 54.2(d)(1)-(5). The subsection requiring a statement of consultation, provides:

No motion for award of attorneys' fees will be considered unless a separate statement of the moving counsel is attached to the supporting memorandum certifying that, after personal consultation and good faith efforts to do so, the parties have been unable to satisfactorily resolve all disputed issues relating to attorneys' fees or that the moving counsel has made a good faith effort, but has been unable, to arrange such conference. The statement of consultation shall set forth the date of consultation, the names of the participating attorneys and the specific results or shall describe the efforts made to arrange such conference and explain the reasons why such conference did not occur.

LRCiv 54.2(d)(1). Finally, the affidavit of moving counsel must at a minimum, set forth the background by providing a brief description of the relevant qualifications, experience and case-related contributions of each attorney for whom fees are claimed; a full discussion of the reasonableness of rates, including any fee arrangement and any fees paid pursuant to such arrangement; and a full discussion of the reasonableness of time spent and expenses incurred. LRCiv 54.2(d)(4)(A)-(C).

III. Analysis.

A. Investigator Costs.

Plaintiff seeks to recover investigator fees and expenses. Specifically, Plaintiff believes that investigative expenses are "other items" within the contemplation of the Local Rule. Doc. 35 at 2; LRCiv 54.1(e)(10). The Court does not agree. Local Rule 54.1(e)(10) applies to "[o]ther items [that] may be taxed with prior court approval." Plaintiff does not contend that it obtained prior court approval to tax its investigator fees or expenses.

Plaintiff seeks to recover $510.00 in costs attributed to fees of the clerk and fees for service of summons and subpoena. Doc. 35 at 5. These costs are ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.