Court of Appeals of Arizona, Second Division, Department B
Not for Publication Rule 111, Rules of the Supreme Court
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PINAL COUNTY Cause No. S1100CR201202597, Honorable Boyd T. Johnson, Judge.
Harriette P. Levitt Tucson Attorney for Appellant.
PHILIP G. ESPINOSA, Judge.
¶1 Following a jury trial, appellant Job Sanchez was convicted of molestation of a child, three counts of sexual abuse of a child, seven counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, and seven counts of sexual conduct with a minor, all dangerous crimes against children. The trial court imposed presumptive, consecutive and concurrent prison terms, including five terms of "life imprisonment." Counsel has filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Clark, 196 Ariz. 530, 2 P.3d 89 (App. 1999), stating she has reviewed the record and has found no "arguable issues on appeal." Counsel has asked us to search the record for error. Sanchez has not filed a supplemental brief.
¶2 Viewed in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's findings of guilt. See State v. Tamplin, 195 Ariz. 246, ¶ 2, 986 P.2d 914, 914 (App. 1999). The evidence presented at trial showed Sanchez had, on multiple occasions, engaged in oral sex and sexual intercourse with M.M., a minor under twelve, fondled her breasts, used vibrators "inside" her vagina, forced her to manually stimulate his penis, and videotaped several such incidents, saving several such recordings as well as another pornographic video recording of a child. We further conclude the sentence imposed is within the statutory limit. See A.R.S. §§ 13-705; 13-1404; 13-1405; 13-1410; 13-3553.
¶3 Pursuant to our obligation under Anders, we have searched the record for fundamental, reversible error and have found none. Therefore, Sanchez's ...