Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Sharp v. Ryan

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

January 28, 2014

Jason Lawrence Sharp, Petitioner,
v.
Charles L. Ryan, Respondent.

ORDER

DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge.

Petitioner Jason Lawrence Sharp, who is confined in the Central Arizona Correctional Facility in Florence, Arizona, has filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and has paid the $5.00 filing fee. The Court will require an answer to the Petition.

I. Petition

Petitioner was convicted by a jury in Yavapai County Superior Court, case #CR2006-1544, of two counts of attempted sexual assault and was sentenced to a 7-year term of imprisonment. Petitioner indicates that his direct appeal was denied and that the Arizona Supreme Court denied review. He further indicates that his state petition for post-conviction relief was denied by the trial court and, on August 7, 2012, the Arizona Court of Appeals denied his petition for review. On February 15, 2013, the Arizona Supreme Court denied Petitioner's petition for review.

Petitioner names Charles L. Ryan as Respondent. Petitioner raises one ground for relief. Petitioner alleges that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial in violation of his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The Court will require Respondents to answer the Petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a).

II. Warnings

A. Address Changes

Petitioner must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Petitioner must not include a motion for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action.

B. Copies

Petitioner must serve Respondents, or counsel if an appearance has been entered, a copy of every document that he files. Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(a). Each filing must include a certificate stating that a copy of the filing was served. Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(d). Also, Petitioner must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice to Petitioner.

C. Possible Dismissal

If Petitioner fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the Court).

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. 1) and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by certified mail pursuant ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.