Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fierro v. Ryan

United States District Court, D. Arizona

March 10, 2015

Jose Abel Fierro, Plaintiff,
v.
Charles L. Ryan, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

PAUL G. ROSENBLATT, District Judge.

Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bade in light of the plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrates' Report and Recommendations (Doc. 36), the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's recommendations should be adopted and that the plaintiff's objections should be overruled. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 31) is accepted and adopted by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff[]s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 28), construed as a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, is granted and the Clerk of the Court is directed to file the Second Amended Complaint attached to Doc. 28.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Badilla, Houze, Molera, Pitrowsky, Stephan, Fizer, Quintero, Wiggin, Jackson, Tucker, Ryan, Luen, Morales, Rojas, Malachinski, Pratt, Merchant, Rioochi, Stark, Miller, Espinoza, Anderson, Shruff, Thompson, Brown, Stowell, Greeley, Lacrone, and Theodore are dismissed from this action.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Count Two of the Second Amended Complaint is dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ODERED that Defendants McCarville, Ochoa, Pruett, Forester, Mcoffy, Smith, Shuster, and Sanders shall respond to Count One of the Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Veckcovic and Brower shall respond to Count Three of the Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Nash and East shall respond to Count Four of the Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:

(1) That the Clerk of Court is directed send Plaintiff a service packet including the Second Amended Complaint and this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendants McCarville, Ochoa, Pruett, Forester, Mcoffy, Smith, Shuster, Sanders, Veckcovic, Brower, Nash, and East.

(2) That Plaintiff shall complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date this Order. Plaintiff is advised that the United States Marshal will not provide service of process if Plaintiff fails to comply with the Court's Order.

(3) That Plaintiff is warned that if he does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Second Amended Complaint on a Defendant within 120 days of the filing of the Second Amended Complaint, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m); LRCiv 16.2(b)(2)(B)(i).

(4) That the United States Marshal is directed to retain the Summons, a copy of the Second Amended Complaint, and a ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.