Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Romero v. Ryan

United States District Court, D. Arizona

March 18, 2015

Francisco Javier Romero, Petitioner,
v.
Charles L. Ryan, Respondent.

ORDER

ROSLYN O. SILVER, Senior District Judge.

On February 11, 2015, Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau issued a Report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. (Doc. 73). No objections were filed.

A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b). Where any party has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's R&R, the district court's review of the part objected to must be de novo. Id. If, however, no objections are filed, the district court need not conduct such a review. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). No objections having been filed, the R&R will be adopted in full.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 73) is ADOPTED and the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.