Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State v. Millis

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Second Division

March 9, 2017

The State of Arizona, Appellee,
v.
Jeremy David Millis, Appellant.

         Appeal from the Superior Court in Pima County No. CR20130560001 The Honorable Jane L. Eikleberry, Judge

          Mark Brnovich, Arizona Attorney General Joseph T. Maziarz, Chief Counsel, Phoenix By Kathryn A. Damstra, Assistant Attorney General, Tucson Counsel for Appellee.

          Dean Brault, Pima County Legal Defender By Robb P. Holmes, Assistant Legal Defender, Tucson Counsel for Appellant.

          Judge Miller authored the opinion of the Court, in which Presiding Judge Staring and Judge Espinosa concurred.

          OPINION

          MILLER, Judge.

         ¶1 A jury found Jeremy Millis guilty of one count of intentional or knowing child abuse under circumstances likely to result in death or serious physical injury and one count of first-degree murder, both committed against a victim under age fifteen. Millis was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of release for thirty-five years for murder, to be followed by a consecutive ten-year prison term for child abuse. On appeal, he contends the trial court erroneously precluded expert testimony about his autism, he was prejudiced by a duplicitous charge, and the court erred by allowing the victim's mother to be accompanied at trial by a facility dog.[1] We affirm for the following reasons.

         Factual and Procedural Background

         ¶2 "We view the facts and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to upholding the jury's verdict[s]." State v. Causbie, 241 Ariz. 173, ¶ 2, 384 P.3d 1253, 1255 (App. 2016). Millis and S.F. began dating in 2012 and after a few months they began sharing an apartment. Not long after that, the relationship ended and Millis moved out, but they remained on good terms with one another. In order to help offset the cost of the lease that S.F. now bore on her own, Millis agreed to watch S.F.'s two young sons one day a week while she was at work.

         ¶3 On the morning of January 24, 2013, S.F. changed the diaper of her eight-month-old son, C.K. He had no bruises on him. She later took some pictures of C.K. "having a lot of fun . . . and being very smiley" in his bouncer. Millis arrived to babysit the boys and she left for work at around 2:00 p.m. Millis was the only person watching the boys while S.F. was at work.

         ¶4 S.F. arrived home around 11:00 p.m. She looked in on the boys and they appeared to be asleep. Millis told S.F. that C.K. had been coughing and choking earlier that night, but S.F. was not worried because she knew C.K. had a condition called tracheomalacia, a "floppiness" in the cartilage of the trachea that sometimes caused him to make choking sounds, cough, or wheeze. Millis left and S.F. went to bed.

         ¶5 C.K. woke up at about 2:30 or 3:00 a.m. and S.F. tried to feed him a bottle. He did not eat much, but seemed to go back to sleep after about fifteen or twenty minutes. Then at about 5:30 a.m., C.K. started crying in a way that "didn't sound right. It wasn't his normal cry." S.F. picked him up but he would not open his eyes or respond to his name, and she had to hold his head up.

         ¶6 S.F. rushed C.K. to the hospital, which was across the street from her apartment. When they arrived at the emergency room, the staff took him right away, but he began having seizures. At 6:53 a.m., S.F. texted Millis and told him something was wrong with C.K.-he was crying "weird" and was nonresponsive. Millis replied that C.K. had been "a little weird when he did that cho[]king thing" the night before. She asked if C.K. had hit his head on anything, and Millis replied, "I don't think so. Just from him sitting on the carpet and tip[p]ing over . . . [b]ut nothing bad." She told Millis C.K. was "seizing" and had a "head bleed, " to which Millis replied, "Oh my god. Maybe that's what he was doing last night. I didn't know what he was doing. I squeezed his neck a little [because] he was having trouble breathing. He cried a little then went back to sleep so I thought he was fine." In a subsequent recorded confrontation call, Millis told S.F. he had found C.K. "stiff and making "gasping noises" at one point, and had responded by "squeez[ing] his neck" "firm[ly]."

         ¶7 C.K. had bilateral subdural hematomas, which caused bleeding on both sides of his brain, bruising, and swelling. Analysis of a CT scan indicated the head trauma had occurred within approximately the last twenty-four hours, and could not have been the result of C.K. merely falling back onto carpet from a seated position. His fontanel was also bulging, and in each eye he had "too many [retinal hemorrhages] to count" across all layers of the retina. C.K. also had bruises on his head, ears, neck, chin, upper arms, shoulders, and "wrap[ping] around" his chest and rib cage. Numerous medical professionals testified that C.K.'s injuries were not consistent with an accidental fall, but were consistent with blunt force head trauma, intentional choking, and violent shaking.

         ¶8 C.K. died on January 30, five days after he was admitted to the hospital. A forensic pathologist opined that the date of the injuries was five to six days prior to death. The pathologist ruled C.K.'s death a homicide and determined the co-equal and interrelated causes of death to be (1) blunt force trauma to the head, and (2) hypoxic ischemic injury, which is a lack of oxygen and blood to the brain.

         ¶9 S.F. was interviewed by investigating detectives the day C.K. was admitted to the hospital. She showed them her text message exchange with Millis. They located Millis, advised him of his Miranda[2] rights, and he agreed to an interview. When they confronted him with information about C.K.'s head injuries, Millis told the detectives he had accidentally hit C.K.'s head on the oven door while he was taking food out of the oven, even though he had denied any head injuries when he was texting with S.F. while she was at the hospital. He also told the detectives that C.K. had been "crying a lot" and that he had "choked [C.K.]" with his hand. In a second Mirandized interview after C.K. died, Millis again admitted he had been "frustrated" with C.K., "just wanted him to stop crying, " and "chok[ed]" him to get him to quiet down, adding that he "just couldn't take it anymore" and "I did what I did."[3] Millis also told his ex-wife in a recorded jail video call that "he [had] choked [S.F.'s] baby."

         ¶10 At trial, Millis argued the blunt force trauma alone could have caused the brain swelling, which in turn could have choked off oxygenated blood to the brain, causing the hypoxic ischemic injury notwithstanding any strangulation. However, the forensic pathologist testified that the blunt force trauma alone could not account for certain injuries noted on an MRI. In closing, Millis argued that his choking the baby was not what killed him, that S.F. had inflicted the injuries that caused C.K.'s death after he had left that night, and that "shaking plus impact explains the [whole] universe of injuries that we have." In the alternative, he argued he had choked C.K. recklessly or negligently, not intentionally.

         ¶11 The jury convicted Millis of all charges and he was sentenced as described above. We have jurisdiction pursuant to ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.