Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

White v. Ryan

United States District Court, D. Arizona

March 19, 2019

Adrian White, Plaintiff,
v.
Charles L Ryan, et al., Defendants.

          SCHEDULING ORDER

          DAVID C. BURY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         Plaintiff is a pro se prisoner who has filed an action alleging civil rights violations. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B)(iv) (exempting from Rule 26 initial disclosure requirements actions brought without an attorney by a person in custody); LRCiv. 16.2(b)(2)(B) (setting case management deadlines for cases designated on the detainee track). This Scheduling Order, entered pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16, shall govern the course of this action:

         IT IS ORDERED that the parties abide by the following:

         1. Any motion for summary judgment regarding exhaustion of administrative remedies shall be filed within 60 days of the filing date of this Order. Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2014). If such a motion is filed by that date, discovery is stayed and the deadlines set in this scheduling order are continued to begin running from the date the motion for summary judgment is resolved. If no such motion is filed by that date, the following scheduling order is entered:

         2. The deadline for disclosure of all lay and expert witnesses is: 120 days from the filing date of this Order or 120 days from the filing date of the Order resolving any motion for summary judgment regarding exhaustion.

         3. All discovery shall be completed by: 150 days from the filing date of this Order or 150 days from the filing date of the Order resolving any motion for summary judgment regarding exhaustion. Parties are reminded that they are not to file the actual disclosures with the Court, just the notices of disclosure.

         In the event of a dispute over discovery matters, parties are cautioned to first engage in personal consultation regarding the dispute and to make a sincere effort to resolve the conflict. The parties should act to resolve discovery disputes quickly. The moving party must certify that after consultation, the parties have been unable to resolve the matter. LRCiv. 7.2(j).

         4. Dispositive motions, other than the exhaustion motion, shall be filed by 30 days from the close of discovery.

         Motions, including dispositive motions, shall be set for oral argument, if requested by counsel, and at the discretion of the Court. A party desiring oral argument on a motion shall request argument by placing “Oral Argument Requested” immediately below the title of the motion or response, pursuant to LR Civ. 7.2(f). The Court will set oral argument accordingly.

         When any pleadings or memoranda are appended with more than one exhibit, the exhibits shall be divided by tabbed dividers, and there shall be a table of contents for the exhibits. All documents shall be secured on the left-hand side either by a staple or in some other fashion so that pages can be turned without the document falling apart. This applies to an original filed under seal and all copies. JUDGE'S COURTESY COPIES ARE REQUIRED, which “shall reference[] the specific document number, [and] shall be printed directly from CM/ECF.” See LR Civ. 5.4; Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual § II.D (emphasis added).

         Pursuant to LR Civ. 7.2(i), failing to file the requisite responsive memorandum or failing to appear at oral argument may be deemed a consent to the granting or denial of any motion, and the Court may dispose of the motion summarily.

         5. The parties shall file their joint proposed pretrial order by: 30 days from the close of discovery or 30 days from the filing date of the Order resolving any dispositive motion filed after discovery is completed.

         6. The pretrial conference will be set upon receipt of the joint proposed pretrial order. The parties responsible for trial of the lawsuit shall appear and participate in the Pretrial Conference. At the pretrial conference the Court will set the deadlines for filing and disposing of the following matters: proposed voir dire, jury ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.